<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Truth is Stranger than Fiction &#187; censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://currawong.net/tag/censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://currawong.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited</title>
		<link>http://currawong.net/2010/02/03/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-v-iinet-limited/</link>
		<comments>http://currawong.net/2010/02/03/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-v-iinet-limited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>currawong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iiNet vs AFACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currawong.net/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iiNet vs. AFACT.  iiNet wins, comprehensively.  The summary makes for nice reading.  I believe the government should take particular note of this part: The law recognises no positive obligation on any person to protect the copyright of another. I think the government neither has to decide what we can and can&#8217;t access on the internet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iiNet vs. AFACT.  iiNet wins, comprehensively.  The summary makes for nice reading.  I believe the government should take particular note of this part:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Times; line-height: normal; font-size: small;">The law recognises no positive obligation on any person to protect the copyright of another.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>I think the government neither has to decide what we can and can&#8217;t access on the internet and needs to recognise and encourage people to take responsibility for themselves.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/24.html">Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited includes summary No. 3 [2010] FCA 24 4 February 2010</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://currawong.net/2010/02/03/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-v-iinet-limited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t impose double standards on &#8220;Internet freedom&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://currawong.net/2010/01/25/dont-impose-double-standards-on-internet-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://currawong.net/2010/01/25/dont-impose-double-standards-on-internet-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>currawong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currawong.net/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny stuff this, considering that the US created a cyber security force to protect its citizens from rogue organisations and governments, whereas the Chinese government cyber security is to protect the government from the people. Don&#8217;t impose double standards on &#8220;Internet freedom&#8221; &#8211; People&#8217;s Daily Online.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny stuff this, considering that the US created a cyber security force to protect its citizens from rogue organisations and governments, whereas the Chinese government cyber security is to protect the government from the people.</p>
<p><a href="http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90776/90883/6877055.html">Don&#8217;t impose double standards on &#8220;Internet freedom&#8221; &#8211; People&#8217;s Daily Online</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://currawong.net/2010/01/25/dont-impose-double-standards-on-internet-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An open letter to Senator Stephen Conroy from a concerned parent</title>
		<link>http://currawong.net/2009/12/25/an-open-letter-to-senator-stephen-conroy-from-a-concerned-parent/</link>
		<comments>http://currawong.net/2009/12/25/an-open-letter-to-senator-stephen-conroy-from-a-concerned-parent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>currawong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Clean Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currawong.net/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government treating the internet like it does movies and TV is turning the whole filter and censorship issue into a farce. An open letter to Senator Stephen Conroy from a concerned parent! &#8211; Atomik Soapbox.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government treating the internet like it does movies and TV is turning the whole filter and censorship issue into a farce.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.atomiksoapbox.com/2009/12/an-open-letter-to-senator-stephen-conroy-from-a-concerned-parent.html">An open letter to Senator Stephen Conroy from a concerned parent! &#8211; Atomik Soapbox</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://currawong.net/2009/12/25/an-open-letter-to-senator-stephen-conroy-from-a-concerned-parent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

